Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Guidry v. Hooper
as 6:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Miles Guidry and Miles J Guidry
Defendant:
Tim Hooper and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stepp v. Myers et al
as 1:2023cv00579
Plaintiff:
Shawn David Stepp
Defendant:
Marcus Myers and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McMahon v. Louisiana et al
as 3:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
James Cody McMahon
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, John Bel Edwards and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moorehart v. Caits et al
as 6:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bruce Moorehart
Defendant:
Irvin Caits, Terry Kraut, Joshua Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holder v. Cooley et al
as 2:2023cv00334
Plaintiff:
Dexter Deangelo Holder
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Col Holden, Col Tillery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Louisiana et al
as 2:2022cv06218
Plaintiff:
Emile Hawkins
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Sheriff of Jefferson Davis Parish, Locke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapp v. Guidroz et al
as 6:2022cv06186
Plaintiff:
Kayvyon C Sapp
Defendant:
Bobby J Guidroz, Derrick Metoyer, James Doucet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sapp v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv06158
Plaintiff:
Kayvyon C Sapp
Defendant:
Wydette Williams, Carla Costello, Johnny Hedgemon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Louisiana et al
as 2:2022cv05788
Plaintiff:
Demetricius Young
Defendant:
State of Louisiana and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Strickland v. Hooper et al
as 2:2022cv05185
Plaintiff:
Lawson Eugene Strickland
Defendant:
Timothy Hooper and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
