Cases 31 - 40 of 396
Stewart v. Cooley et al
as 2:2022cv01022
Plaintiff:
Charles Stewart
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Rachel Rowland, Lt. Bihm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Authement v. Champagne et al
as 5:2022cv00578
Plaintiff:
Thomas Authement
Defendant:
Anthony P Champagne and Kerry P Byrne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Caddo Parish Jail et al
as 5:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Kendrell Thomas
Defendant:
Caddo Parish Jail, Steve Prator and Rick Farris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vallejo v. Whittington et al
as 5:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Joe Thomas Vallejo, Tammy Lynn Vallejo and Thomas Hernandez
Defendant:
Jullian Whittington and Captain Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Childress v. Bossier Parish et al
as 5:2022cv00231
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jefferson Childress
Defendant:
Police Jury Bossier Parish, Parker Self, Edward Mouton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stringer v. Prator et al
as 5:2021cv04202
Plaintiff:
Marcus T Stringer
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Farris, C Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Caddo Parish
as 5:2021cv03452
Plaintiff:
Christopher G Thomas
Defendant:
Sheriffs Dept Caddo Parish, Officer E Parker, Officer R Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Walker et al
as 5:2021cv03623
Plaintiff:
Ketrick Thomas
Defendant:
C Walker, CDR Farris, Medical Department Caddo Parish Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Caddo Correctional Center
as 5:2021cv02508
Plaintiff:
Chester L Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
Caddo Correctional Center, Rick Farris, Kelly Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Henry et al
as 5:2021cv02507
Plaintiff:
Ketrick Thomas
Defendant:
Cpl Terry Henry, Caddo Correctional Center, Sgt Walkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
