Cases 41 - 50 of 439
James v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv01833
Plaintiff:
Charley James
Defendant:
Pat Smith, Warden Bass and Major Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Zordan et al
as 3:2022cv01656
Plaintiff:
Eddie Brown, III
Defendant:
Victor Zordan, Jay Russell, Joshua Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Prator et al
as 5:2022cv01571
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Dennis Ray Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Steven Prator, Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, Rickey Fraiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2022cv01277
Plaintiff:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Winfred V Campbell
Defendant:
James LeBlanc, Tim Hooper, Carl Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benard v. Caddo Medical Staff et al
as 5:2022cv01119
Plaintiff:
Shawnee Benard and Shawnee M Benard
Defendant:
Caddo Medical Staff, Nurse Smith, Nurse Leon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Bellard, et al
as 6:2022cv01045
Plaintiff:
Freddie Francis, Jr. and Freddie Francis, Jr
Defendant:
Jessie Bellard, Lonie Soileau, Dr Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilcrease v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
John Edward Gilcrease, Sr
Defendant:
Ricky Jones, Pat W Smith, Nolen Bass, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center
as 5:2022cv00818
Plaintiff:
Johnny Smith
Defendant:
Caddo Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Caddo Parish Correctional Center
as 5:2022cv00817
Plaintiff:
Marcus Smith
Defendant:
Caddo Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ma'at
as 2:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
Brian Scott Smith
Defendant:
S Ma'at
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
