Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Rodriguez v. Martinez
as 2:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Abraham Salomon Rodriguez
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garcia-Rodriguez v. Ma'at
as 2:2022cv02573
Plaintiff:
Anderson Garcia Rodriguez and Anderson Garcia-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Warden Ma'at
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Degante et al v. Markey
as 1:2022cv00662
Plaintiff:
Luis Degante, Diana Lee Perez, Joselyn Caridad Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Dr Markey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rodriguez v. Redding et al
as 1:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Jorge Rodriguez
Defendant:
Don Redding, Tommy Foster and Crawford Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. USA et al
as 1:2020cv00936
Defendant:
J Baltazar, E Early, RN Koon and others
Plaintiff:
Adam S Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz-Lopez et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2018cv00931
Plaintiff:
Jhair Generoso Paternina-Christopher, Hernando Antionio Jimenez-Ortiz, Jose Maria Barrios-Ipuana and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jefferson B Sessions, III and Loretta E Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Torres-Rodriguez v. Johnson
as 2:2017cv01215
Plaintiff:
Jorge Torres-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Bernacett-Rodriguez v. Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2016cv00959
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bernacett-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez-Ruiz v. Clay
as 2:2016cv00496
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rodriguez-Ruiz
Defendant:
Becky Clay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
