Cases 11 - 20 of 122
Benton v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2022cv02027
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Benton
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Orr v. USA et al
as 2:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lynn Orr
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Ma'at
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wright v. U S P Pollock et al
as 1:2022cv00027
Petitioner:
Marcus D Wright
Defendant:
Warden U S P Pollock, Merrick Garland and Director Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Anthony v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2021cv03865
Plaintiff:
Richard Anthony
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Ma'at et al
as 2:2021cv02238
Defendant:
Designation & Sentence Computation Center, S Ma'at, F C I and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jeansonne v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv02097
Plaintiff:
Shane Jeansonne
Defendant:
USA and Director Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Warden et al
as 2:2021cv01147
Plaintiff:
Issam Hussein Abu-Ghosh, Frederick Banks and Issam-Abu Gosh
Defendant:
Psychology, Trust Fund Supervisor, S Ma'at and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ivey v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2021cv00649
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Ivey
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Trump et al
as 2:2021cv00459
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, U S House of Representatives, Designation & Sentence Computation Center and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2021cv00498
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Sekou Maat and Sekou Ma'at
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
