Cases 71 - 80 of 2,018
Malone v. USA
as 6:2023cv01313
Petitioner:
William Malone and William Claude Malone
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hollier v. USA
as 2:2023cv01262
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hollier
Defendant:
The United States of America and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Mosley v. USA
as 5:2023cv01264
Petitioner:
Larry E Mosley, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Nelson v. Hudson et al
as 6:2023cv01250
Plaintiff:
Terbrina Nelson
Defendant:
Chantell Hudson, USA and Chantell M Hudson
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Boudreaux v. USA
as 6:2023cv01223
Petitioner:
Kendrick Shane Boudreaux
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Heard v. USA
as 5:2023cv01175
Petitioner:
Sirtajro T Heard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lightfoot v. USA
as 3:2023cv01163
Petitioner:
**Sanctioned/Barred* Chad Lightfoot
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Query et al v. USA et al
as 2:2023cv01151
Plaintiff:
Brandon Query and Jenna Query
Defendant:
USA, Bayne Jones Army Community Hospital, Brooke Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Holmes v. USA
as 3:2023cv01136
Petitioner:
Brandon Holmes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Louis et al v. U S Dept of Veterans Affairs et al
as 5:2023cv01084
Not Classified By Court:
Dr. Francis T. Wiser
Plaintiff:
Tamiko Louis, Gregory Louis, Dominic Louis and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Overton Brooks VA Medical Center, U S Dept of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
