Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Deblanc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co
as 2:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Cristi Deblanc
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pierson et al v. National General Insurance Co et al
as 2:2022cv02777
Plaintiff:
Charles Pierson and Cristy Pierson
Defendant:
National General Insurance Co and Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hutchins et al v. Jayco Inc of Indiana et al
as 6:2022cv00871
Plaintiff:
Darrell L Hutchins, Cristi Hutchins and B & E Equipment L L C
Defendant:
Jayco Inc of Indiana, Dixie Motors L L C doing business as Dixie R V Superstores of Acadiana L L C and Shyft Group U S A Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Teague v. Darden et al
as 6:2017cv00814
Plaintiff:
Eric Teague
Defendant:
Brandy Darden, Clinton Darden, Erol Catalan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teague v. Gibbens et al
as 6:2017cv00699
Plaintiff:
Eric Teague
Defendant:
Cristie Gibbens, Gerald Block and Patricia Pitchford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teague v. USA et al
as 2:2016cv01430
Plaintiff:
Eric Teague
Defendant:
USA, Gerald J Block, Cristie Gibbens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. Rapides Parish et al
as 1:2016cv01058
Plaintiff:
James Allen Robinson
Defendant:
Sheriffs Office Rapides Parish, William Earl Hinton, Antoine Batiste and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teague v. Darden et al
as 6:2016cv00416
Plaintiff:
Eric Teague
Defendant:
Clinton Darden, Brandy Darden, Cristie Gibbens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2015cv00023
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hall
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, Geo Group Inc, Terry Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
