Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01121
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
In Re: Subpoena Issued to Innovation Law Lab
as 6:2023cv00420
Plaintiff: State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Missouri and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, U S Dept of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner: Innovation Law Lab
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00110
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01366
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01376
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Arizona et al v. Garland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv01130
Plaintiff: State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Missouri and others
Defendant: Merrick Garland, U S Dept of Justice, David Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04030
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?