Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Grayson v. Sisco et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2023cv10847
Plaintiff:
Deandre Cornell Grayson
Defendant:
Angir Sisco, Lura Brown, Margaret Quellete and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Deloney v. Stewart et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv11455
Plaintiff:
Bedford Deloney
Defendant:
Stewart, Peters, King and others
Shaw v. Rewerts
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2020cv10666
Petitioner:
Mr. Rahmanh Keith Shaw
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shaw v. Jackson
as 2:2019cv11734
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan and Shane Jackson
Petitioner:
Eugene Roy Shaw
Shaw v. USA
as 2:2018cv13408
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Karl Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Shaw v. USA
as 2:2017cv13093
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Floyd Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROBERT MARTIN, as Conservator for DARLENE MARTIN, a Protected Person v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2017cv11845
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, LT. MICHAEL NELSON, SGT. EARL FISHER and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARTIN, as Conservator for DARLENE MARTIN, a Protected Person
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoine v. Klee et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2015cv14329
Plaintiff:
Suffren Antoine
Defendant:
P. Klee, W. Rondeau, L. Evans and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.