Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Stephens v. Chandler et al
as 2:2012cv13800
Plaintiff:
Omar Stephens
Defendant:
Steven Chandler and Bumpus Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
Chandler v. Alvarado et al
as 2:2012cv12738
Plaintiff:
Daniel Chandler
Defendant:
Noe Alvarado, Debra Scutt, C C Brown and others
Stephens v. Chandler et al
as 2:2012cv12600
Plaintiff:
Omar Stephens
Defendant:
Steven Chandler and Bumpus Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Albert, et al v. Fair Associates, et al
as 1:2012cv11812
Plaintiff:
Else Marie Albert , John C Anderson , Per Axelson and others
Defendant:
Fair Associates, Samuel S Fair, Fair Energies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
United States of America v. Chandler
as 4:2011mj30312
Defendant:
Jennifer M Chandler
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Chandler
as 4:2011mj30312
Defendant:
Jennifer M Chandler
Plaintiff:
United States of America
lafrance et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.
as 2:2011cv12398
Plaintiff:
terrance lafrance , Marlya Depauw , sharon lafrance and others
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.
Objector:
The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee for the Certificate Holders of CWALT 2004-ECCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chandler v. Chase Home Finance LLC et al
as 2:2011cv10646
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance LLC , JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William J Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Chandler v. Chase et al
as 2:2011cv10080
Plaintiff:
Grace Chandler
Defendant:
Chase , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and Bank of America
Barlow et al v. Logos Logistics, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv14371
Plaintiff:
Gerald Barlow , Morris Bentley , Frederick Chandler and others
Defendant:
Logos Logistics, Inc. and Apptree, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
