Cases 41 - 50 of 14,679
Carpenter v. USA
as 4:2024cv10764
Petitioner:
Maurice Willis Carpenter
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dooley v. USA
as 2:2024cv10716
Petitioner:
Donte Dooley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Adams v. USA
as 2:2024cv10717
Petitioner:
Raymond W. Adams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Peterson
as 2:2024mc50234
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Duane Peterson
Interested Party:
Denise Terry
Patterson v. USA
as 1:2024cv10630
Petitioner:
Anthony James Patterson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Patterson v. USA
as 1:2024cv10631
Petitioner:
Anthony James Patterson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Green v. USA
as 2:2024cv10580
Petitioner:
Clifford Green
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Jankowski
as 2:2024mc50222
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Jankowski
Interested Party:
Stephen Jankowski, Paula Jankowski, Mary Jankowski and others
United States of America v. J&A Tax Services, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv10560
Defendant:
Ann Heibeck, J&A Tax Services, LLC Doing business as Equitax, Ann Marie Dziergas and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Adams v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv10562
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Adams
Defendant:
United States of America, Michigan, State of, Saginaw, County of and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
