Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Benjamin Franklin Franchising SPE LLC et al v. David Michael Plumbing, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv10286
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Franklin Franchising SPE LLC, One Hour Air Conditioning Franchising SPE LLC and Mister Sparky Franchising SPE LLC
Defendant:
David Michael Plumbing, Inc., David G. Michael and Karla Michael
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Staffney v. Cole et al
as 2:2022cv12820
Plaintiff:
Harold Staffney
Defendant:
Stephen D. Cole, Blodgett Memorial Medical Center, Kenneth Kooistor and others
McKenzie v. Blocker et al
as 2:2022cv10886
Plaintiff:
Gerald McKenzie
Defendant:
David G. Blocker and Detroit, City of
Jones v. Lydall, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv11969
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Lydall, Inc., David G. Bills, James J. Cannon and others
Staffney v. Cohle et al
as 2:2016cv11682
Plaintiff:
Harold Staffney
Defendant:
Stephen Cohle, David G. Kamm, Blodgett Memorial Medical Center/Spectrum Health and others
Brosch v. Pope-Starnes et al
as 2:2015cv11319
Plaintiff:
Tracey Brosch
Defendant:
Sara Pope-Starnes, David G. Gorcyka and Oakland, County of
Muer et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv10130
Plaintiff:
David G. Muer and Mary Louise Muer
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co. , Trott & Trott, P.C. and others
Painters Union Deposit Fund v. Innovative Ceilings and Walls et al
as 2:2012cv14785
Plaintiff:
Painters Union Deposit Fund
Defendant:
Innovative Ceilings and Walls and David G Henwood
Love et al v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2011cv13412
Plaintiff:
James Love, III
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Oakland, County of, Fred M Mester and others
Painters Union Deposit Fund v. Innovative Ceilings & Walls, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv10812
Plaintiff:
Painters Union Deposit Fund
Defendant:
Innovative Ceilings & Walls, Inc. and David G Henwood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
