Cases 61 - 70 of 159
Compton v. Betten Baker Hudsonville, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00487
Defendant:
Betten Baker Hudsonville, Inc., Betten Baker Buick GMC Hudsonville, Inc., Adventure Credit Union and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Compton
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710 Odometer Tampering
Meahl v. The Nation Company, LLC
as 1:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
D Darren Meahl
Defendant:
The Nation Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bracy v. The Parable Group, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00403
Plaintiff:
Sherry Bracy
Defendant:
The Parable Group and The Parable Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bozung v. Christianbook, LLC
as 1:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bozung
Defendant:
Christianbook, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Duffy v. Enagon, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
James A. Duffy
Defendant:
Enagon, LLC, Martineau, Hackett, O'Neil & Klaus, PLLC, Terrance L. Ebels and others
Mitton et al v. Christian Insurance Group, et al
as 1:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Amber Mitton, Shani Rasor, Cameron Cook and others
Defendant:
Christian Insurance Group, d/b/a Christian Financial, Jacob Hagg, Noah Bushnell and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mellen v. Dalton et al
as 1:2021cv00784
Plaintiff:
Matt Mellen
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, Jason Dalton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Meahl v. The Nation Company LLC
as 1:2021cv00670
Plaintiff:
D Darren Meahl
Defendant:
The Nation Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hester et al v. Plus Communications Inc.
as 1:2021cv00671
Plaintiff:
Ruby Hester and Stewart Murie
Defendant:
Plus Communications Inc. d/b/a Charisma Media and Plus Communications Inc. doing business as Charisma Media
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ulsh v. DTN, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00664
Plaintiff:
Rick Ulsh
Defendant:
DTN, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
