Cases 71 - 80 of 143
Sligh v. Engedi Salon, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00197
Plaintiff:
JamieLea Sligh
Defendant:
Engedi Salon, LLC and Acrisure P1, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 825
Swartwout v. Edgewater Grill LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
David Charles Swartwout
Defendant:
Edgewater Grill LLC, Blanche E. Klaus, H&S Companies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. KMG Prestige, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01251
Defendant:
KMG Prestige, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Harris
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hudson v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv01136
Plaintiff:
Nora D. Hudson
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and PST Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Dunbar v. Knoll, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01082
Plaintiff:
Tishua N. Dunbar
Defendant:
Knoll, Inc. and MorningStar Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Jenkins v. McHugh
as 1:2011cv00949
Plaintiff:
Aaron S. Jenkins
Defendant:
John M. McHugh
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Helm et al v. Alderwoods Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00924
Defendant:
Alderwoods Group, Inc. and Alderwoods Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Naperalsky and John Schabloski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United Association of Journeymen Plumbers and Journeymen Steamfitters and Pipefitters Health & Welfare Plan et al v. Kent et al
as 1:2011cv00922
Plaintiff:
Local Union 357 United Association of Journeymen Plumbers and Journeymen Steamfitters and Pipefitters Health & Welfare Plan and Rich Ogrizovich
Defendant:
Stacey M. Kent and Brody Kent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Stark v. Hot Shots Nuclear Medicine et al
as 1:2011cv00909
Plaintiff:
Marci Stark
Defendant:
Hot Shots Nuclear Medicine , Allan Doan and Matthew Kazmierski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cook v. Avon Protection Systems, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00893
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Cook
Defendant:
Avon Protection Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
