Cases 1 - 7 of 7
C.R. Meyer & Sons Company et al v. Hastings Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 1:2021cv00451
Defendant:
Schultz Excavating & Asphalt of Ludington, LLC and Hastings Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
C.R. Meyer & Sons Company and Travelers Indemnity Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
American Contractors Indemnity Company et al v. J. Slagter & Son Construction Company et al
as 1:2015cv01331
Plaintiff:
American Contractors Indemnity Company and U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
J. Slagter & Son Construction Company, Highway Improvement Company, Slagter Equipment Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Juana's Packing Company, LLC v. William Consalo & Sons Farms, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00150
Plaintiff:
Juana's Packing Company, LLC
Defendant:
William Consalo & Sons Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Herman v. Sempris, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Eric Herman
Defendant:
Sempris, LLC and E. Mishan & Sons, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
A. Tanner & Sons Roofing Co., Inc. v. Frazier et al
as 1:2012cv01036
Plaintiff:
A. Tanner & Sons Roofing Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Patricia S. Frazier , Reno Frazier and United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
J. Slagter & Son Construction Company v. IBCS Group, Inc., The et al
as 1:2011cv00605
Plaintiff:
J. Slagter & Son Construction Company
Defendant:
IBCS Group, Inc., The , IBCS Fidelity, Inc. and Edmund Scarborough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rutherford & Associates, Inc. v. Wm. Thies & Sons, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00412
Plaintiff:
Rutherford & Associates, Inc. and Rutherford & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Wm. Thies & Sons, Inc.
Counter-claimant:
Wm. Thies & Sons, Inc.
Counter-defendant:
Rutherford & Associates, Inc. and Rutherford & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
