Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Trustees of the Michigan BAC Pension Fund et al v. KP Flooring, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01281
Plaintiff:
Michigan BAC Pension Fund, BAC of Michigan Health and Welfare Fund, Statewide Trowel Trades Joint Apprenticeship and Training Fund and others
Defendant:
KP Flooring, Inc. a Michigan corporation, Kenneth Pilarski and KP Flooring, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Plumbers & Pipefitters Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Plan v. Lafay
as 1:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Plumbers & Pipefitters Local Union No. 333 Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Plan and Local Union No. 333 Trustees of the Plumbers & Pipefitters Supplemental Unemployment Benefit Plan
Defendant:
Shawn Lafay
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Local 174 Trustees of the WMI Plumbers, Fitters and Svc Trades Health & Benefits Fund et al v. Boardwell Mechanical Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
THE WEST MICHIGAN PLUMBERS, FITTERS AND SERVICE TRADES LOCAL UNION NO. 174 HEALTH & BENEFITS FUND, THE WEST MICHIGAN PLUMBERS, FITTERS AND SERVICE TRADES LOCAL UNION NO. 174 PENSION TRUST FUND;, THE WEST MICHIGAN PLUMBERS, FITTERS SERVICE TRADES LOCAL UNION NO. 174 401(k) RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN and others
Defendant:
BOARDWELL MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC., DOUGLAS E BOARDWELL, II and Douglas E. Boardwell, II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Stolsonburg v. Rodgers et al
as 1:2021cv01092
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Carol Stolsonburg
Defendant:
Brett N. Rodgers, Brett N. Rodgers Trustee Account, Scott W. Dales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Rasmussen et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2013cv01084
Plaintiff:
Jenna Rasmussen and Ryan Rasmussen
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , Unknown Trustee and Unknown Holders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
