Cases 1 - 5 of 5
East Lansing, City of v. Alternative Service Concepts, LLC, et al
as 1:2024cv00635
Plaintiff:
East Lansing, City of
Defendant:
Alternative Service Concepts, LLC a Delaware corporation, doing business as Davies Claims Solutions and Lloyd's Underwriters at London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Traverse Bay Parasail, LLC et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, severally subscribing, each for themselves and not for one another, to Policy Nos. SA10162-R3-15581 and SA10162-R4-15581 et al
as 1:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Traverse Bay Parasail, LLC and Saburi Boyer
Defendant:
Certain Underwriter's at Lloyds, First Flight Insurance Group, Inc., Crosswalk Claims Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Halbower v. Hiscox Syndicate 33 of Lloyd's of London
as 1:2022cv00964
Counter Defendant:
JULIE SCHULZ HALBOWER
Counter Claimant:
Hiscox Syndicate 33 of Lloyd's of London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Sabal Palm Consulting, LLC v. Alpha International, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00283
Defendant:
J.K. Properties, LLC, Alpha International, Inc., J.K. Manufacturing Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Sabal Palm Consulting, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amway Asia Pacific Ltd. et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London who Subscribed to Directors, Officers and Company Liability Insurance Policy No. 509/QB319199, Those et al
as 1:2007cv01277
Plaintiff:
Amway Asia Pacific Ltd., New AAP Limited, Amway Corporation and others
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London who Subscribed to Directors, Officers and Company Liability Insurance Policy No. 509/QB319199, Those and Excess Directors and Officers and Company Reimbursement Policy No. 757/FD970847
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
