Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lynch Sales Company v. Webb et al
as 1:2019cv00537
Defendant:
Daniel Webb, R.M. Putt, Inc. and Robert Putt
Plaintiff:
Lynch Sales Company
Not Classified By Court:
Facilitative Mediator
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Canas et al v. Harley's Cabaret, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01315
Plaintiff:
Paola Canas, Brooke Taylor, Megan Daniels and others
Defendant:
Harley's Cabaret, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Krystal Morris and CrowdSurfer Media LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Morren v. Morren Plastic Molding, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00685
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Morren, Sr.
Defendant:
Morren Plastic Molding, Inc. and Twin Bay Docks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Evoqua Water Technologies LLC v. M.W. Watermark, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
Evoqua Water Technologies LLC
Defendant:
M.W. Watermark, LLC , Michael Gethin , James Vande Wege and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Malibu Media, LLC v. McAlvey
as 1:2013cv00163
Plaintiff:
Malibu Media, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel McAlvey
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Traverse City Film Festival v. Martone et al
as 1:2011cv00947
Plaintiff:
Traverse City Film Festival
Defendant:
Daniel Martone and Laura Martone
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Leo's Coney Island Franchising Company v. Baker
as 1:2011cv00075
Plaintiff:
Leo's Coney Island Franchising Company
Defendant:
Daniel Baker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Daniel v. Ganz USA, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00807
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Daniel
Defendant:
Ganz USA, LLC and Ganz, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Midwest Survey Supply, Inc. et al v. Lasco, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00493
Plaintiff:
Midwest Survey Supply, Inc., Midwest Survey Supply, Inc., James E. Driftmyer and others
Defendant:
Lasco, Inc., Daniel I. Hill, Mike Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
