Cases 1 - 8 of 8
GS Holistic, LLC v. Bucktown Smoke Emporium LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01262
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Bucktown Smoke Emporium LLC doing business as Bucktown Smoke Emporium, Imanuel Smith and Perry Yarabrough
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Stafford-Smith, Inc. v. staffordsmithgroup.com
as 1:2020cv00401
Defendant:
staffordsmithgroup.com
Plaintiff:
Stafford-Smith, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Stafford-Smith, Inc. v. staffordsmiths.com
as 1:2020cv00402
Defendant:
staffordsmiths.com
Plaintiff:
Stafford-Smith, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
S & H Leasing, LLC v. S & H Automotive Group, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00050
Plaintiff:
S & H Leasing, LLC
Defendant:
S & H Automotive Group, LLC, Brandon Smith and Paul Hargreaves
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Kilwins Chocolates Franchise, Inc. v. Fate, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01043
Plaintiff:
Kilwins Chocolates Franchise, Inc.
Defendant:
Fate, Inc. and Stephen D. Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Lady Godiva's, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01001
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , E.O. Smith Music , Universal Music-Z Tunes LLC and others
Defendant:
Lady Godiva's Inc. , Mark London and Sensations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Festival Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 1:2010cv00205
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., MJ Publishing Trust, Concord Music Group, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Festival Enterprises, Inc., Scott Robinson and Andrew Papanichola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. Daisy Mae's Sports Bar and Grill, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00470
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Chris Layton, Thomas Smedley and Reese Wynans and others
Defendant:
Daisy Mae's Sports Bar and Grill, Inc. and Michael G. Smith
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
