Cases 51 - 57 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00653
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01062
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hassan v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, District Director of et al
as 1:2009cv00196
Plaintiff:
Ihab Hamza Hassan
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, District Director of, Department of Homeland Security, United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Boltenko et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2007cv01055
Plaintiff:
Alexander Boltenko and Tatiana Boltenko
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Detroit District Office and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mahdi v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Detroit District Office et al
as 1:2007cv00916
Plaintiff:
Ahmad Adil Mahdi and Ahmad Adil Mahdi
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Detroit District Office, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Hearings on Denials of Applications for Naturalization
Kaur v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv00001
Petitioner:
Satnam Kaur
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Carol Jenifer and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Hearings on Denials of Applications for Naturalization
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
