Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Saucier et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00984
Plaintiff:
Jo Anne Saucier, Cheryle L Hanzel, Julie Johnson and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ivicsics et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00675
Plaintiff:
EVELYN JEANNETTE BARGER, Carmela Lopez, Diane Williams and others
Defendant:
. DOE MANUFACTURERS 1-100, C. R. BARD, INC., SOFRADIM PRODUCTION SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holliday et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00034
Plaintiff:
Pamela Holliday , Kathleen Walsh , Phyliss Clark and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richardson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01669
Plaintiff:
Susan Richardson , Tracy Robinson , Jeff Robinson and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathes et al v. Ethicon,Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01668
Plaintiff:
Kathy Mathes , Ramona Duby , Audrey Edwards and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , American Medical Systems, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv01310
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Lewis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Caldera Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Faddis et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00489
Plaintiff:
Robin Faddis and Arthur Faddis , Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spencer et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00348
Plaintiff:
Theresa Spencer and Walter Spencer
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
