Cases 1 - 10 of 5,269
USA v. Argo
as 6:2024cv03273
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Phillip Morgan Argo, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
KCD KC Disposal LLC v. City of Independence, MO et al
as 4:2024cv00611
Defendant:
Jennie Vaught, John Perkins, City of Independence, MO and others
Plaintiff:
KCD KC Disposal LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03272
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00609
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Eddystone Rail Company, LLC
as 4:2024mc09005
Creditor:
Eddystone Rail Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv06110
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
ESO Solutions, Inc. v. Baum
as 4:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
ESO SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
DEBRA BAUM
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (a) Injunction against Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Planned Parenthood Great Rivers - Missouri v. Missouri Department of Social Services et al
as 2:2024cv04157
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood Great Rivers - Missouri
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Social Services and Missouri Medicaid Audit & Compliance Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
