Cases 1 - 9 of 9
May v. Target Corporation et al
as 4:2023cv00948
Plaintiff:
Robert C May
Defendant:
Target Corporation, Ferrandino & Son, Inc. and Joey's Lawn Pro LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Anthony v. Swope Health Services et al
as 4:2023cv00936
Plaintiff:
Aireania Anthony
Defendant:
Swope Health Services and D.D.S. Marquita Mays
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0233 Remand of tort action involving federally funded business
Webb et al v. Medicalodges, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Alma Eileen Webb, Estate of decedent, MARGARET MAY MARIE FUGATE and Estate of decedent Margaret May Marie Fugate
Defendant:
Medicalodges, Inc. and MEDICALODGES NEVADA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
SPANGLE THE CLOWN v. LALA TRUCKING, INC. et al
as 6:2022cv03324
Plaintiff:
SPANGLE THE CLOWN
Defendant:
LALA TRUCKING, INC. and BALJINDER SINGH
Intervenor:
Amanda May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Mays et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2019cv04041
Defendant:
3M Company
Plaintiff:
Lana Mays, Stanley Mays, Lana K. Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunlap et.al v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2016cv01060
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Plaintiff:
Terri Dunlap , Heather Worsham , Glory Celestine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
May et al v. Dr. Shaw et al
as 5:2016cv06100
Plaintiff:
Julia Ann May and Loren W May
Defendant:
Dr. Shaw, Dr. Greir, - David and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
May et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00861
Plaintiff:
Bethany May and Jimmy May
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health & Urology, Gynecare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
May et al v. Ruan Logistics Corporation
as 5:2011cv06069
Plaintiff:
Chris M. May and Sheryl Suzanne May
Defendant:
Ruan Logistics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
