Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Frank v. Medtronic Minimed, Inc., et al ***CASE FILED IN ERROR - correctly filed at 2:23-cv-4152.***
as 4:2023cv00558
Defendant:
John Joseph Frank, Medtronic Minimed, Inc., Minimed Distribution Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frank v. Medtronic Minimed, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04152
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Frank
Defendant:
Medtronic Minimed, Inc., Minimed Distribution Corp., Medtronic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hinton v. Ortega-Virrueta
as 4:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Frank A Hinton
Defendant:
Estefani L Ortega-Virrueta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Woodruff et al v. Frank E.Lorenz Sr. Trust et al
as 6:2023cv03150
Plaintiff:
Edgar E. Woodruff and Virginia S. Woodruff
Defendant:
Frank E.Lorenz Sr. Trust and Barbara Lorenz
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Kemper v. Kolbe
as 4:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Robert Kemper
Defendant:
William Kolbe and Frank Kolbe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Benanti v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 6:2020cv03097
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Frank Benanti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holt v. Schmutz et al
as 2:2018cv04096
Defendant:
Bill Schmutz, Stacie Frank, Brandon Herndon and others
Plaintiff:
Donna Holt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott et al v. Williams, Jr.
as 4:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
Caron Scott and Trey Scott
Defendant:
Frank Williams, Jr. and Peterson Farms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Gardner et al
as 4:2016cv01070
Plaintiff:
Sarah King
Defendant:
Frank B. Gardner and Aaron Fuehrer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richmond v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 2:2016cv04122
Plaintiff:
Frank Richmond
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
