Cases 41 - 50 of 134
Randall et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00965
Plaintiff:
Melody L. Randall and Ken Randall
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00951
Plaintiff:
Amber Baker and Charlie Baker
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmitt v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00924
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lynn Schmitt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Damron et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2012cv00912
Plaintiff:
Pamela J Damron and Bobby J. Damron
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maine et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00914
Plaintiff:
Sandra R Maine and Louis E. Maine
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stokes et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00915
Plaintiff:
Joy E Stokes and Jerry Stokes
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hanlon et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00926
Plaintiff:
Tonja L Hanlon and William Hanlon
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00928
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Faye Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hightower v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00919
Plaintiff:
Carol Hightower
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Webster et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00918
Plaintiff:
Vicky Lynn Webster and Harvery P. Webster, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
