Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Those Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's, London et al v. Automobile Acceptance Corporation Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Those Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's, London and Markel International Insurance Company Limited
Defendant:
Automobile Acceptance Corporation Inc. and Eugene J Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Great Lakes Insurance S.E. et al v. Sunshine Shopping Center, Inc.
as 4:2021mc09002
Defendant:
Sunshine Shopping Center, Inc. doing business as Sunshine Mall
Plaintiff:
Great Lakes Insurance S.E., Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and HDI Global Specialty SE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 4:2018cv00517
Plaintiff:
Affinity Insurance Program Marketing LLC and National Real Estate Insurance Group, LLC
Defendant:
Southern Cross Underwriters, Inc., Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and CRC Insurance Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
National Real Estate Insurance Group LLC et al v. CRC Insurance Services Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00518
Defendant:
Southern Cross Underwriters Inc., CRC Insurance Services Inc. and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Plaintiff:
National Real Estate Insurance Group LLC and Affinity Insurance Program Marketing LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Valley Hospitality, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01193
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Defendant:
Valley Hospitality, Inc., La'Vena Pratt, D.B.-P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Those Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's, London Who Subscribe to Certificate No. LLG044257 v. Quezada et al
as 2:2010cv04006
Defendant:
Everardo Quezada, Abel Quezada Ramirez, Adriana Quezada and others
Plaintiff:
Those Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's, London Who Subscribe to Certificate No. LLG044257
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
