Cases 101 - 110 of 114
Johnson v. Presley et al
as 4:2007cv00105
Plaintiff:
Roger Johnson
Defendant:
Dewight Presley, Lawrence Kelly and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Golden v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00117
Plaintiff:
Fredrick T. Golden
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly, Darlester Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00116
Plaintiff:
Billy Bailey
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly and Nathan Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gordon v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00071
Plaintiff:
Anthony Douglas Gordon
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Kosta Vlahos, Dolan Waller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keyes v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00060
Plaintiff:
Billy Gene Keyes
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2007cv00052
Plaintiff:
Stephon Chapman
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Joe Thronton, Christopher Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Epps et al
as 4:2006cv00137
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Johnson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, "Unknown" Hands, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ivy v. Mississippi Dept. of Corrections et al
as 4:2007cv00049
Plaintiff:
Carlos Ivy
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept. of Corrections and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamison v. Hood et al
as 4:2007cv00039
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lee Jamison
Defendant:
Jim Hood, Christopher Epps, Larry Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Byrd et al
as 4:2006cv00177
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott
Defendant:
Raymond Byrd, Joseph Barnett, "Unknown" Carey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
