Cases 21 - 30 of 72
Reed v. Nichlos et al
as 1:2018cv00108
Plaintiff:
Ray Reed
Defendant:
Nichlos and Starkville Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Butler
as 1:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
Ray Reed
Defendant:
Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison-Reed v. Piggs et al
as 1:2018cv00092
Plaintiff:
Velma Harrison-Reed
Defendant:
James B. Piggs , Mam-Zak, Inc. , John Doe Persons 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In the Matter of a Subpoena Issued to Gathright Reed Medical Supply LLC
as 3:2018mc00007
In Re:
In the Matter of a Subpoena Issued to Gathright Reed Medical Supply LLC
Plaintiff:
Roche Diagnostics Corp. and Roche Diabetes Care, Inc.
Respondent:
Gathright Reed Medical Supply LLC, Priority Care Pharmacy at Cotton Gin Point, Priority Care Pharmacy LLC and others
Defendant:
Brinsons Hospital Supplies, Inc. and Northwood, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Reed v. MDOC et al
as 4:2018cv00022
Petitioner:
Calvin Reed
Respondent:
MDOC and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reed-Figgs v. Navient Solutions, LLC
as 3:2018cv00005
Plaintiff:
Delilah Reed-Figgs
Defendant:
Navient Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gardner v. Mills et al
as 1:2017cv00146
Plaintiff:
James M. Gardner
Defendant:
Andrew Mills, M. Turner, Lucy Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv00152
Plaintiff:
Tara Pinion Reed
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ivy v. Turner et al
as 1:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Renorial Ivy
Defendant:
Marshall Turner, Debbie Cooley, Regina Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stock et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 4:2016cv00231
Plaintiff:
Gene Stock , Arthur S. Nichols, Jr. , Jay Nichols and others
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection AG, Syngenta Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
