Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Pulse v. MGM Resorts Mississippi, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00179
Plaintiff:
Tammy M. Pulse
Defendant:
MGM Resorts Mississippi, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wells et al v. Tronox, LLC
as 1:2011cv00023
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne Wells and Tammy Jayne Wells
Defendant:
Tronox, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00031
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Powell v. Crowley
as 1:2009cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tammy Powell
Defendant:
Regina Crowley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanders v. Ford Motor Company
as 4:2008cv00103
Plaintiff:
Tammy Winemiller Sanders
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Parkes et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2008cv00002
Plaintiff:
Luke Parkes, Luke Parkes, Tammy Parkes and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Jones-Gipson v. Barden Gaming, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00127
Plaintiff:
Tammy Jean Jones-Gipson and Tammy Jean Jones-Gipson
Defendant:
Barden Gaming, Inc., Fictitious Defendants A, B, and C and Fictitious Defendants D, E and F
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Long v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv00028
Plaintiff:
Tammy Long and Tammy Long
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Shinn, et al v. Columbus Mun Sch, et al
as 1:2000cv00491
Plaintiff:
Walter NMI Shinn, Carrie Stephenson, Johnnetta Temple and others
Defendant:
Columbus Municipal School District, Dr. Therrell Myers, Julie Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
