Cases 51 - 60 of 211
Shannon v. Epps et al
as 1:2013cv00035
Petitioner:
James M. Shannon
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Attorney General for the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grose v. Epps et al
as 3:2013cv00047
Petitioner:
Johnny Grose
Respondent:
Christopher Epps and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00010
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Epps et al
as 4:2013cv00005
Petitioner:
Willie Lewis Henry, Jr.
Respondent:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt Sparkman, Ernest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00125
Plaintiff:
Charles Smith
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and Earnest Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Wexford Health Source, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
Dennis O'Neal Lee
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source, Inc., Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00112
Petitioner:
Sidney Ray Griffin
Respondent:
Christopher Epps
Defendant:
Romuio Armedariz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wall v. Walker et al
as 2:2012cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jerome Wall
Defendant:
David Walker and Christopher Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Morris et al
as 4:2012cv00108
Plaintiff:
Devin A. Bennett
Defendant:
Norris Morris, Timothy Morris, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00106
Plaintiff:
Bennie Ward
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lorenzo Cabe, Lisa Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
