Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Rayford v. Berryhill
as 3:2020cv00286
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff: Sherri Rucker Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Rayford v. Franklin Collection Service, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00045
Plaintiff: Ivy Rayford
Defendant: Franklin Collection Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rayford v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00163
Plaintiff: Kristy Ann Rayford
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Anderson v. Horton et al
as 4:2010cv00026
Petitioner: Reginald Anderson
Respondent: Rayford Horton and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burrough v. Horton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv00117
Petitioner: Christopher Jason Burrough
Respondent: Rayford Horton, Christopher Epps and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belk v. Horton et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00242
Petitioner: Kentrail Belk
Respondent: Rayford Horton and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. Hayne et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00160
Plaintiff: Terence O. Boyd
Defendant: Steven Hayne, Jimmy Simmons, John A. Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe et al v. Rayford et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00168
Plaintiff: Billy Wolfe and Rosemary Wolfe
Defendant: Walter Rayford, M. D. and Southeast Urology Network, P.C.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury Both

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?