Cases 11 - 20 of 80
Clark et al v. Wafer
as 1:2018cv00398
Plaintiff:
August Reimoninq and William Clark
Defendant:
Marqui Wafer and Marquis Wafer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Lard Oil Company, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
Ramsay Clark
Defendant:
Lard Oil Company, Inc., John Does 1-10 and ACM Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dickens v. Autozone, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
William Dickens and Karla Dickens
Defendant:
Gardner Denver, Inc., Viking Pump, Inc., Carquest Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Vaughters v. Wilson et al
as 3:2018cv00284
Plaintiff:
Marcus Vaughters
Defendant:
Clark L. Wilson, Jr. and John Doe's 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Jordan D. Clark
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clarke County, Mississippi v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00036
Plaintiff:
Clarke County, Mississippi
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Malone v. Clark
as 3:2017cv00943
Plaintiff:
Teresa Malone
Defendant:
Charles Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clarke et al v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP et al
as 1:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
Nikita Chantell Clarke and Kimberly Monique Nettles
Defendant:
Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP, Penske Logistics, LLC, Jessie D. Stephenson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clarke et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.
as 3:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
Leslie Clarke and Chris Drew
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy v. Clark Gin Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00786
Plaintiff:
Arnold Murphy
Defendant:
Clark Gin Service, Inc. and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
