Miller Act Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Upper Room Masonry Company Limited Liability Partnership v. Russell Construction Co., Inc et al
as 5:2024cv00134
Plaintiff: United States for the Use and Benefit of Upper Room Masonry Company Limited Liability Partnership d/b/a Upper Room Masonry Company and Upper Room Masonry Company Limited Liability Partnership d/b/a Upper Room Masonry Company, United States of America for the use and benefit of the foregoing
Defendant: Russell Construction Co., Inc and Federal Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Ferguson Enterprises, LLC v. Jones & Smith Contractors, LLC et al
as 7:2023cv01180
Plaintiff: Ferguson Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Ferguson Enterprises, LLC of Virginia and Ferguson Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Ferguson Enterprises, LLC of Virginia, United States of America for the use and benefit of the foregoing
Defendant: Jones & Smith Contractors, LLC, Sauer Construction, LLC a/k/a Sauer Incorporated, Federal Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America et al v. Federal Constructors, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00275
Plaintiff: Alexander Building Systems, LLC d/b/a BC Steel Buildings, United States of America, for the use and benefit of the foregoing, ex rel
Defendant: Federal Constructors, Inc., North America Specialty Insurance Company and Swiss Re Corporate Solutions American Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Miller Act
C.J. Mahan Construction Company LLC v. Lambert Engineering and Construction Services, Inc. et al
as 7:2020cv00233
Defendant: Lambert Engineering and Construction Services, Inc. and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the use and benefit of C.J. Mahan Construction Company LLC, C.J. Mahan Construction Company, LLC and C.J. Mahan Construction Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
Alexander v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00199
Plaintiff: Steven Obrian Alexander
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Miller Act
Cole v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00200
Plaintiff: Kawamie S. Cole
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Miller Act
Vereen v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00197
Plaintiff: Lester Charles Vereen
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Ace Electric, Inc. v. Westfield Insurance Company et al
as 7:2014cv00031
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Ace Electric, Inc.
Defendant: Westfield Insurance Company and The Davis Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Gaylor, Inc. of North Carolina v. Caddell Construction Co., Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2012cv00305
Defendant: Caddell Construction Co., Inc. , W.G. Yates & Sons Construction Company , Caddell Yates Joint Venture and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc., et al
as 5:2012cv00409
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc. , Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland , Federal Insurance Company and others
Counter_claimant: CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Counter_defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?