Cases 91 - 100 of 115
Escoto et al v. Anderson et al
as 4:2010cv00055
Plaintiff:
Milton Escoto , Elvin Martinez , Yosveny Mazariegos and others
Defendant:
Richard C. Anderson, Cesar Espinoza and Efrain Cortez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Solis v. Duncan
as 7:2009cv00197
Plaintiff:
Hilda L. Solis
Defendant:
Edgar P. Duncan
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 0801 Penalities/Federal Mine Safety Health Act
v. Boardman Sand
as 4:2009cv00206
Defendant:
Boardman Sand
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 0801 Penalities/Federal Mine Safety Health Act
Custis v. Roanoke Chowan Community College
as 2:2009cv00049
Plaintiff:
Ethelene G. Custis
Defendant:
Roanoke Chowan Community College
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Calderon et al v. SG of Raleigh d/b/a Alll My Sons Moving and Storage et al
as 5:2009cv00218
Defendant:
SG of Raleigh, John Georgedakis, Bilingual Human Resources Consultants, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Arnoldo Reyes Calderon, Arnoldo Reyes Calderon, Elias Salomon Cortes De Leon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gallop v. Belk, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00052
Plaintiff:
Lena A. Gallop
Defendant:
Belk, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Collins v. Taylor et al
as 5:2008cv00461
Plaintiff:
Tonzie Collins
Defendant:
Roy Taylor and Town of Hope Mills
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thompson v. Moen, Incorporated
as 5:2008cv00300
Defendant:
Moen, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Maurice Thompson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holley et al v. Edenton Dyeing & Finishing, LLC et al
as 2:2007cv00041
Plaintiff:
William L. Holley, William L. Holley and William L. Holley
Defendant:
Edenton Dyeing & Finishing, LLC, Stephen Wener and Thomas M. Gilreath
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Perez v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 5:2007cv00285
Plaintiff:
Orlando Rodriguez Perez
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
