Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Doe v. Sultan
as 3:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Fard Sultan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gean v. Charlotte Health and Rehabilitation Center et al
as 3:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Thomasina Cofield Gean
Defendant:
Charlotte Health and Rehabilitation Center and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cunningham v. Headstart Warranty Group, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Headstart Warranty Group, LLC, Vehicle Service Department, Sing for Service, LLC doing business as MEPCO and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cunningham v. Affordable Auto Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Affordable Auto Protection, LLC, Autoguard Advantage Corporation, Dimension Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Doe v. Wolf et al
as 3:2020cv00481
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
USCIS, Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Bailey v. University of Oxford et al
as 3:2015cv00436
Plaintiff:
Jay Bailey
Defendant:
University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, The Dons of Oxford and Cambridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bollmeier et al v. Hummel et al
as 3:2015mc00035
Plaintiff:
Eddie Bollmeier , Bill Tracey and Simon Parrott
Defendant:
Gary Hummel, Stephen Bradford, Rob Streble and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Taylor-Todd v. Trivette et al
as 1:2012mc00028
Plaintiff:
Jean Taylor-Todd
Defendant:
Marven Dale Trivette, Kevin Frye, Mountain Electric Cooperative and others
Doe v. Doe
as 5:2007mc00004
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Jane Doe
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
