Cases 1 - 10 of 582
SANCHEZ v. OKAH
as 2:2024cv04011
Plaintiff:
DAVID SANCHEZ
Defendant:
STELLA OKAH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FITZGERALD v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv01441
Petitioner:
DAWUD FITZGERALD
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and MATTHEW PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GRANDBERRY v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
CHANCY GRANDBERRY
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, NAJAD, CASTRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON et al v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv01087
Plaintiff:
DAVID THOMPSON and MICHAEL STEVENS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT, LT NAJAD, CASRRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FITZGERALD v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv00997
Petitioner:
DAWMEEN FITZGERALD
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MERCEDES v. GLADING et al
as 2:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO M MERCEDES
Defendant:
JO ASTRID GLADING, MICHAEL DENNY, ANGIE BOLIVAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WELCH v. DAVIS
as 2:2023cv23301
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS WELCH
Defendant:
BRUCE DAVIS
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
QUINONES v. GRELLA et al
as 2:2023cv23038
Plaintiff:
KEVIN QUINONES
Defendant:
WARDEN GRELLA and BERGEN CO. JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NISSIM v. CHARLES et al
as 2:2023cv22992
Petitioner:
EFRAIM NISSIM
Respondent:
WARDEN RON CHARLES and ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WILLIAMS v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2023cv22937
Petitioner:
BRIAN WILLIAMS
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
