Cases 11 - 20 of 32
WILEY v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2019cv19789
Defendant:
JANE DOES (1-10), ABC, LLP (1-10), JOHN DOES (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
DAN WILEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
JACKSON v. HUDSON TRANSIT LINES, INC.
as 2:2019cv19303
Defendant:
HUDSON TRANSIT LINES, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOEL JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
GAUVIN v. FANTASIA ACCESSORIES LTD. et al
as 2:2019cv17565
Defendant:
FANTASIA ACCESSORIES LTD., MICHAEL BLANCONE and EDWARD AZAR
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GAUVIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ELEY v. MONTCLAIR HOSPITAL, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv13240
Defendant:
SODEXO USA, ALLEN REIGERT, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ELEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ARMANI v. ALMA BANK et al
as 2:2018cv11713
Defendant:
ALMA BANK and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-5
Plaintiff:
SIRARPI ARMANI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
PONDILLO v. LUX HOME, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv06547
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PONDILLO
Defendant:
LUX HOME, INC. , JOHN AND JANE NOS. 1 THROUGH 10 DOE and ABC CORP #1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
BROWN v. CARE ONE, CARE ONE, LLC. et al
as 2:2017cv01184
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE BROWN
Defendant:
CARE ONE, CARE ONE, LLC. , 600 KINDERKAMACK ROAD OPERATING COMPANY, LLC. , ORADELL HEALTH CARE CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
CHARLIER v. HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 2:2017cv00555
Plaintiff:
MARIE CHARLIER
Defendant:
HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and CHRISTOPHER GAZDICK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
ARRIGO v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04098
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M ARRIGO
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC , JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 10 and ABC CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
KHANNA v. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2016cv01330
Plaintiff:
YATIN KHANNA
Defendant:
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY , ANDREA C WEST , CECILE A FELDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
