Cases 91 - 100 of 6,749
RIZK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv02745
Petitioner:
WISAM RIZK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ELM v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
FRED ELM
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON and C. PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
EL v. WARDEN DAVID KELSEY
as 1:2024cv02662
Petitioner:
NOBEL CHRISTO EL and NOBLE CHRISTO EL
Respondent:
WARDEN DAVID KELSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PETRONGLO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00164
Petitioner:
THOMAS EDWARD PETRONGLO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NICOLESCU v. WARDEN FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv00138
Petitioner:
EMANUEL NICOLESCU
Respondent:
WARDEN FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CALLAWAY v. WARDEN, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 1:2024cv00264
Petitioner:
OREADER CALLAWAY
Respondent:
WARDEN, NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FITZGERALD v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2024cv01441
Petitioner:
DAWUD FITZGERALD
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and MATTHEW PLATKIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENRY v. DAVIS
as 2:2024cv00171
Petitioner:
BASIM HENRY
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JUSTO v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
STEVEN JUSTO
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LEWIS v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
HARRISON LEWIS, III
Respondent:
STEPHANIE THOMPSON and RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
