Cases 1 - 10 of 18,956
RAMOS v. RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06645
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN RAMOS
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOPKINS v. HICKS et al
as 1:2024cv06646
Plaintiff:
AL-QUON HOPKINS
Defendant:
ADM. MARCUS HICKS and NURSE MARSHA LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HELMS v. DAISY
as 1:2024cv06644
Plaintiff:
JESSE HELMS
Defendant:
MIKE DAISY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAWKINS v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv06629
Plaintiff:
KEVIN DAWKINS
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and HUDSON COUNTY MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUTLER v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2024cv06549
Petitioner:
AHMAR BUTLER
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06524
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
WILLIAMS v. HUTTON et al
as 1:2024cv06563
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
PTL. WILLIAM HUTTON, PTL. S. O'HALLORAN, B. FIDUCIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRY v. IMAN et al
as 1:2024cv06556
Plaintiff:
LAQUANE CURRY
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT J. IMAN, OFFICER A. VELEZ, SERGEANT M. DEHARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GUNTHER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv06507
Petitioner:
JOHN GUNTHER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CRAWFORD v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2024cv06520
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CRAWFORD
Defendant:
BECKY SCOTT and HUDSON COUNTY MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
