Cases 131 - 140 of 462
McMillian v. Graham et al
as 1:2018cv07183
Defendant:
Correction Officer and Superintendent Harold Graham
Plaintiff:
Herman Carlee McMillian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Keyser
as 1:2018cv06523
Respondent:
Superintendent W. Keyser
Petitioner:
Garland Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. Coveny
as 1:2018cv06059
Respondent:
Superintendent Raymond Coveny
Petitioner:
Michael Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tejada v. Superintendent
as 2:2018cv05823
Defendant:
Superintendent
Plaintiff:
David Tejada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kappen v. Bell
as 2:2018cv05784
Respondent:
Superintendent Earl Bell and Earl Bell
Petitioner:
David Kappen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. Superintendent
as 2:2018cv05420
Petitioner:
Eddie Parker
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeJesus v. Dept. of Corrections New York et al
as 1:2018cv05375
Respondent:
Dept. of Corrections New York, Superintendent William Keyser and Sullivan Correctional Facility
Petitioner:
Salvador DeJesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pazmini v. Colvin
as 1:2018cv05361
Respondent:
Superintendent John Colvin
Petitioner:
Kevin Pazmini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gobardhan v. LaManna
as 1:2018cv04916
Respondent:
Superintendent Jamie LaManna
Petitioner:
Alex Gobardhan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. LaManna
as 1:2018cv04852
Respondent:
Superintendent LaManna
Petitioner:
Regner Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
