Cases 101 - 110 of 158
Pizarro v. Bratton et al
as 1:2016cv01597
Defendant:
76th Pct. Caucasian John Doe Black Hair, Police Commissioner Bratton, Brooklyn A.D.A. Jamaican Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfonso v. Cheron et al
as 1:2016cv01503
Plaintiff:
Wildmes Alfonso
Defendant:
Correction Officer Caldwell, Officer Cheron, DOC Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv07383
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tartt v. White et al
as 1:2015cv07125
Defendant:
Correction Officer Jane Doe, John Doe and C.O. #8413 White
Plaintiff:
Tony Tartt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregg v. Young et al
as 1:2015cv06539
212) 788-9776 (fax:
Corporation Counsel
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gregg
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe, John Doe NYC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pegues v. B.O.P. (MDC Brooklyn)
as 1:2015cv05909
Defendant:
BOP (MDC Brooklyn)
Plaintiff:
Donald Pegues
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abraham v. New York City Police Dept. et al
as 1:2015cv05208
Plaintiff:
Henry Abraham
Defendant:
Mark Dwyer, Police Officer Hugh Herbert, Kings County District Attorney's Office and others
Jones v. De-Blasio et al
as 1:2015cv04753
Defendant:
City of New York, Bill DeBlasio, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughns v. Gilbert et al
as 1:2015cv03999
Defendant:
City of New York and Detective David Gilbert
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Vaughns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campos v. Zuntag et al
as 1:2015cv03816
Plaintiff:
John S. Campos
Defendant:
Paul A. Capofari, Matthew Dilgen, Esq. Daniel M. Donovan, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
