Contract Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London subscribing to policy number LCC000019 v. Farm Family Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv03525
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London subscribing to policy number LCC000019
Defendant: Farm Family Casualty Insurance Company, Hartford Insurance Company and Continental Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance
Thomas v. Continental Insurance Company
as 1:2022cv07027
Plaintiff: Jashaun N. Thomas
Defendant: Continental Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Continental Insurance Company v. D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp.
as 1:2022cv06970
Defendant: D'Onofrio General Contractors Corp. and D
Plaintiff: Continental Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type: Contract Insurance
American Home Assurance Company et al v. Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv02322
Defendant: Northrop Grumman Corporation and Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
Plaintiff: American Home Assurance Company and The Continental Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type: Contract Insurance
American Home Assurance Company et al v. Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv02322
Plaintiff: American Home Assurance Company and The Continental Insurance Company, as successor by merger to Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York
Defendant: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation and Northrop Grumman Corporation, individually and as successor to Northrop Corporation and Grumman Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Continental Insurance Company v. ML Specialty Construction, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01095
Plaintiff: Continental Insurance Company
Defendant: ML Specialty Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance
Faith Ministries, Inc. v. Technology Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv06330
Defendant: Continental Insurance Company, Praetorian Insurance Company and Technology Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Faith Ministries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds et al v. National RailRoad Passenger Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv04717
Counter Defendant: AG De 1830 Compagnie Belge D'Assurances Generales Incendie Accidents Et Risques Divers SA, Accident & Casualty Co., Accident & Casualty Insurance Company Of Winterthur and others
Plaintiff: AG De 1830 Compagnie Belge D'Assurances Generales Incendie Accidents Et Risques Divers SA, Accident & Casualty Co., Accident & Casualty Insurance Company Of Winterthur and others
Cross Defendant: Allianz Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company and others
Defendant: Allianz Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company and others
Counter Claimant: National RailRoad Passenger Corporation
Cross Claimant: National RailRoad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance
The Continental Insurance Company v. Strong Oil Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04609
Defendant: John Doe 2:13cv4609, David Hawke, Hawke Enterprises, LLC and others
Plaintiff: The Continental Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02284
Cross Claimant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?