Cases 1 - 10 of 13
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Village of Oyster Bay Cove, et al
as 2:2022cv07807
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
The Village of Oyster Bay Cove, The Zoning Board of Appeals of The Village of Oyster Bay Cove and The Planning Board of The Village of Oyster Bay Cove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Incorporated Village of Muttontown et al
as 2:2022cv05524
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
The Incorporated Village of Muttontown, The Incorporated Village of Muttontown Board of Trustees, The Planning Board of the Incorporated Village of Muttontown and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Lauren Calabrese, Aldo Calabrese, Tara Rice and others
Intervenor:
Russell McRory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay et al
as 2:2021cv03201
Defendant:
Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay, Planning and Development Department of the Town of Oyster Bay, Town of Oyster Bay, New York and others
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crown Castle Towers 06-2 LLC et al v. The Town of Riverhead et al
as 2:2021cv00789
Defendant:
Town of Riverhead Town Board, Town of Riverhead Zoning Board of Appeals, Town of Riverhead Planning Board and others
Plaintiff:
Sprint Spectrum L.P., Global Signal Acquisitions III LLC, STC-Five LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Planning Board of the Town of East Hampton et al
as 2:2020cv03555
Defendant:
The Town of East Hampton, The Town of East Hampton Building Department, The Planning Board of the Town of East Hampton and others
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Intervenor Defendant:
Peter Corbett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Town of Huntington et al
as 2:2019cv03564
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
The Town of Huntington Planning Board, The Town of Huntington, Building Permit Coordinator of the Town of Huntington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. The Planning Board of the Town of East Hampton et al
as 2:2018cv00242
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Defendant:
The Planning Board of the Town of East Hampton, The Town of East Hampton, The Town of East Hampton Architectural Review Board and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Incorporated Village of Islandia et al
as 2:2013cv05462
Defendant:
Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Islandia and Incorporated Village of Islandia
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Town of Southold Planning Board
as 2:2012cv02838
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Defendant:
Town of Southold Planning Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Village of Atlantic Beach
as 2:2012cv00064
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Defendant:
Village of Atlantic Beach, Village of Atlantic Beach Board of Zoning Appeals and Village of Atlantic Beach Department of Buildings
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
