Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Davis Jr: Beneficiary v. Saab-Dominguez
as 2:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Stanley-Earl Davis Jr: Beneficiary
Defendant:
Karen Saab-Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis Jr: Beneficiary v. Saab-Dominguez et al
as 2:2023cv06658
Plaintiff:
Stanley-Earl Davis Jr: Beneficiary
Defendant:
Karen Saab-Dominguez, H Alexander Gillesapie, Siben And Siben and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lopez-Lopez et al
as 1:2019cv02188
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hernandez, Roberto Lopez-Lopez, Jasmine Valle and others
Defendant:
Hugo Dominguez, The City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05283
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03438
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05535
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montes v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01376
Defendant:
Tommy Butters, Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and Aswil Dominguez
Plaintiff:
Orbin Montes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv06197
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
