Cases 21 - 30 of 119
Jones v. USA
as 1:2019cv05611
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kiond Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jones v. Sawyer
as 1:2019cv04893
Respondent:
Kathleen H. Sawyer
Petitioner:
Byron Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. NYDOCS Commissioner Cynthia Brann et al
as 1:2019cv04874
Defendant:
NYDOCS Commissioner Cynthia Brann, Batchelor Leg Law LTR Cord Nadeen Griffen, Seyomi and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Jones
as 2:2019cv04110
Respondent:
Gerard Jones
Petitioner:
Juan Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Brann et al
as 1:2019cv04093
Defendant:
Act Chief Jones, Ms. Quinn, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ravenell v. Nassau County Correctional Services dept. et al
as 2:2019cv02943
Defendant:
Sgt. Cunningham, RN Sandra Jones, Dr. Henning and others
Plaintiff:
Theodore Ravenell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McGuire v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv07185
Petitioner:
Tommy R. McGuire
Respondent:
Julie Jones, Pam Bondi and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cooper v. New York State et al
as 2:2018cv06656
Defendant:
Jeremy Fanning, Richard Jones and New York State
Plaintiff:
Sam Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Leckie v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv03917
Defendant:
Correction Officer Ling, Department of Corrections and Captain Jones
Plaintiff:
Naquan M. Leckie
Interested Party:
Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Capra
as 1:2018cv03756
Petitioner:
Michael Jones
Respondent:
Superintendent Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
