Cases 41 - 50 of 195
Hill v. Rivers
as 2:2020cv02278
Respondent:
Rivers and Service List
Petitioner:
Demetrius Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hamm v. Prison Health Services
as 1:2020cv01580
Defendant:
Prison Health Services
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wedington v. Gleeson et al
as 1:2020cv01102
Defendant:
Viktor V. Pohorelsky, Aircargo Shipping Services and John Gleeson
Plaintiff:
Calvin Wedington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Golom v. The United States of America c/o The Office of General Counsel et al
as 1:2020cv00388
Defendant:
Post Master General, John, The United States Postal Service c/o and others
Plaintiff:
John D. Golom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gavin v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2020cv00306
Defendant:
Sergeant Jane Doe, Suffolk County Department of Health Services Jail Medical Unit, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford Gavin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fulton v. Core Services Group Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07050
Defendant:
Michael Lowe, John & Jane Does, Patrick McFarland and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell George Fulton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Hart et al
as 2:2019cv06324
Defendant:
3rd Precint P.O. Stallone (6731), 3rd Precint PO Stallone, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Tralik Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05319
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
