Cases 71 - 80 of 11,298
Henton v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02270
Plaintiff:
Naji-Ullah Henton
Defendant:
The City of New York, Officer Granston Gabrielle, Officer Saint Jean Johanne and others
Respondent:
The New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Roberts et al v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv02267
Plaintiff:
Brandon Roberts and Julian Roberts
Defendant:
Sidney B Jones, Lisa Johnson and Dorchester County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Belton v. The County of Nassau, New York et al
as 2:2024cv02353
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Belton
Defendant:
The County of Nassau, New York, The Sheriff of Nassau, Anthony Larocco (Sheriff) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Footman v. Doherty et al
as 2:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Karon Footman
Defendant:
Dale Doherty, Jeffrey Foster, Errol D Toulon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Miller
as 2:2024cv02273
Petitioner:
Juan Henriquez Ramos
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Codner v. USA
as 1:2024cv02079
Petitioner:
Arthur Codner
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
O'Connor v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2024cv02095
Plaintiff:
Kevin O'Connor
Defendant:
The County of Nassau, Detective Taylor Nardo and Detective John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edo v. Ryan et al
as 1:2024cv02187
Plaintiff:
Enekan Edo
Defendant:
Officer Danial Ryan and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Celestine v. Miller
as 1:2024cv02060
Petitioner:
Fritz Celestine
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
