Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Treffy v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv06641
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Treffy
Defendant:
City of New York, ADW Shakeema Cook and John Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv03858
Defendant:
The City of New York and The New York City Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Jamar Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Riley et al
as 1:2019cv02908
Defendant:
Det. Puglissie-Phillips and Det. Jim Riley
Plaintiff:
Jamar Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooks v. New York Courts et al
as 1:2016cv06754
Plaintiff:
Robert Cooks
Defendant:
Court Clerk, District Attorney, E. Greenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Balila v. Nassau County et al
as 2:2016cv00646
Defendant:
All Corporals of All 3 Shifts, All Correctional Officers Working E-1-B-Block, Nassau County and others
Plaintiff:
Rotem Balila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. Reiner et al
as 1:2011cv02131
Defendant:
David Cooke, Maria and Jonathan Reiner
Plaintiff:
Miguel Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Cook
as 1:2010cv05846
Petitioner:
Gregory Clarke
Respondent:
Catherine Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perfetto v. Cook
as 1:2010cv04694
Respondent:
Catherine A. Cook
Petitioner:
Gary Perfetto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Cook
as 1:2009cv03403
Petitioner:
James Walker
Respondent:
Catherine A. Cook and Catherine A. Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Cook
as 1:2009cv02381
Petitioner:
Michael Moore
Respondent:
Katherine Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
