Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Holmes v. Groder et al
as 2:2024cv03645
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Jeffery Scott Groder and Dzurenda E. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Groder et al
as 2:2023cv04140
Plaintiff:
Ms. Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Groder, Michael Kamperveen and Andrea Shiry Ann Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. The People of State of New York
as 1:2022cv00870
Petitioner:
Casanova Holmes
Respondent:
The People of State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. LaManna
as 1:2020cv02769
Respondent:
J. LaManna
Petitioner:
Tremaine Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Devore v. Medical Staff Doctor Hynick et al
as 2:2019cv05644
Plaintiff:
Holmes Alexander Devore, Jr.
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Amerosso, Correctional officer Chambers, Medical Staff Doctor Hynick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. USA
as 1:2016cv03113
Petitioner:
Sharif Holmes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Holmes v. Capra
as 1:2014cv06373
Respondent:
Warden Michael Capra
Petitioner:
Brandon Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holmes v. Knipel et al
as 1:2014cv06018
Defendant:
Aaron I. Blinder, Morgan J. Dennehy, Charles J. Hynes and others
Plaintiff:
Damon Mark Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Borders v. Holmes et al
as 1:2013cv03233
Plaintiff:
Alex Borders
Defendant:
City of New York and Correction Officer Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv03122
Defendant:
Det. Michael Centrone, John/Jane Doe, Commissioner Raymond Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
