Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05023
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04552
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Windward Bora, LLC v. Shami et al
as 1:2020cv03668
Plaintiff:
Windward Bora, LLC
Defendant:
Rachel Shami, JOHN AND JANE 1-10 DOE, Ezra Shami and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Shaw et al v. City of New York et al
as 2:2020cv02952
Defendant:
ADA Sarah McAteer, PO Mary Vecchi, PO Byrne Patrick and others
Plaintiff:
Walter A. Shaw and Vera Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerdova v. Krolewskie Jadlo and Affiliated Restaurants et al
as 1:2020cv01473
Defendant:
JOHN 1-10 DOES, Krolewskie Jadlo, Jolanta Dziemianczyk and others
Plaintiff:
Ludmila Gerdova
Ren v. Arcadia Health Pharmacy, Corp et al
as 2:2020cv01470
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE 1-10 DOE, Yuan King Yung, Arcadia Health Pharmacy, Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Xiaoling Ren
Wilson et al v. Acosta et al
as 1:2020cv00722
Plaintiff:
The City of New York, QUILTY JAMES and Timothy Wilson
Defendant:
JOHN 1-10 DOES, ARLENE ACOSTA, JOHN 1-10 SMITHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zhang v. Nexus Holiday New York Inc et al
as 2:2020cv00275
Defendant:
Lingmin Zhang, Nexus Holiday Group Inc., JOHN AND JANE 1-10 DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Shasha Zhang
Chen v. Ten Seconds Noodles Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00043
Defendant:
Sheng Doe, John Lin, JOHN/JANE #s 1-10 DOE and others
Plaintiff:
Yin Chen
Davila et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv07109
Plaintiff:
Damien Deleon, Jonathan Davila and George Pugachev
Defendant:
The City of New York, P.O. Michael Giallanza and NYPD Officer JOHN/JANE #s 1-10 DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
